Book Riot Live!!

I’m guessing that if you have found our blog that you are probably a book reader.  And if you are a book reader that uses the internet to find new books to read then you have probably visited Book Riot.  Book Riot is famous for it’s posts about the most bookish places in the world and a lot of podcasts. Last weekend, they hosted their first get together, Book Riot Live in New York City.  My friend Melissa decided that she wanted to come and since she was going I thought I would go with her.  I’ve never been to a convention of any kind before so I didn’t really know what to expect. It was held in the Metropolitan West in Hells Kitchen and not a big center so that was comforting.  Also nice that it would be all about books. My people! It felt good to be surrounded by like minded people.  I read a lot but I could tell I was with people who were much more well read that I was and it was inspiring.  Panels ranged from the serious like “How to write what you don’t know” featuring Margaret Atwood and N.K. Jemisin and fun panels like a live playing of the game Slash.  A truly nerdy game of one person pick a character from a set of cards, setting up a scenario and then have the other players pick characters from their set of cards on why they would be in the situation. Like matching Chewbucca with Marie Antoinette.  I’m not sure where you find this game but it’s a must for your nerdy friend.  Also live recordings of their podcasts.  It was nice to get a face to the voice you’ve been listening too.  I should written this review last week when it was all still fresh in my mind but I had so much fun it left me exhausted.  Things I did learn, that Book Riot staff rarely wears pants.  Understandable they mostly work from home.  Margaret Atwood is badass but that I already know.  It’s possible to hold a convention where all different points of views, race, gender, and sexuality can be represented and included.  Book people are really cool people. (also something I already knew) It’s also time for a new tattoo.

Can’t wait to again next year to Book Riot Live.  Here again are some of photos they I took from last week.

Beauty Queens and Music Videos

I’ve found myself thinking about Libbi Bray’s Beauty Queens a lot in the past few days. (That link is to Beth’s awesome review of the book.) As Beth mentions in the review, Bray does a good job of capturing certain expectations about women. (spoilers ahead). In the book, there is a subplot about the Corporation, a mega-company bent on continuing to push into illegal markets and trades, and the beauty queens throw a wrench in the works by crash landing in the middle of the operation. From the moment of the crash landing, the queens are completely underestimated. As Beth said, “They are just girls so they are not that important. They won’t survive long. Right?” This part of the book captures how old ideas about gender still cling on even though advancements have been made. But, Bray did a good portraying another dynamic as well and this is what I want to talk about today. Changing norms have made some space at the top of many fields for women to succeed, but it hasn’t really leveled the playing field. Some women have an advantage over other women because of other ways our societies are unfair. This plays out in the book through the interactions of two non-white characters Nicole, an African American woman, and Shanti, an Indian immigrant. In the book, they know that there is only room in the top ten for one non-white contestant and that makes them leery of each other. They also know that their faults will be scrutinized more than their white counterparts, a subplot seen through the eyes of Nicole as she remembers the last time an African American contestant had a sex scandal and it ruined her chances of success (even though the consequences for white contestants wouldn’t be as severe).

This has been on my mind because some of those dynamics have been in the news recently. If you are at all interested in pop culture, you may have heard that the 2015 MTV VMA award nominations are out and that Nicki Minaj is not happy with them. After the release of the nominations she took to twitter and stated that she felt that her videos for Anaconda and Feeling Myself were slighted because of the type of artist she is and that other artists doing what she does in her videos are rewarded. She also stated that because she wasn’t celebrating particular types of bodies, she wasn’t getting as much love from the awards committee. I don’t watch a lot of music videos, any really, and I don’t think I’ve seen any of the videos nominated (although, I have seen Anaconda). Then, Taylor Swift took Minaj’s comments personally. I would like to suggest that part of the reason why Swift might take Minaj’s comments personally is that she knows that there is a limited amount of space for women at the top of her field and she works hard and is unwilling to give up that space. Minaj’s twitter criticisms are valid: as a society we do value certain bodies higher than other bodies and this is not only seen in how we reward people but also in how treat people in general.

Beauty Queen was an interesting book because it brought intersectionalism, the idea that people may be operating in a space under more than one type of oppression, into the conversation meant for teen audiences about how women are treated. And, while I found the book to be funny and moving, this broadening of the conversation of what feminism is and who it best serves might be the most important part of the book.

Highs and Lows of Fandoms by Cassandra Clare and Maggie Stiefvater

I’ve actually never really been apart of a fandom per se.  There are a lot of books, movies, TV shows that I love and care about.  Despite my love for Harry Potter, Percy Jackson, Magnus Bane, Katniss Everdeen and more, I’ve never signed up to any message boards or read fan fictions.  I may have time to time read other fans blogs and theories about why a certain character did this or what they think will happen next but never really participated in it personally.  Once upon a time, I was very involved in a i guess you could call a  fandom for tennis player, Andy Roddick.  Do athletes have fandoms?  I started posting on a fan site called Roddickrocks.com.  Soon, I was a board moderator and then I started writing recaps of Andy’s matches and got more involved from there.  I spent a lot of time on Roddickrocks.  It was the first site I checked in the morning and the last before I went to bed.  It was almost a job, keeping up with the demands.  After a year though, the site splintered.  I have forgotten the exact details but some of us wanted to take the site in one direction and others wanted to keep as is.  Feelings were hurt and relationships severed.  A few of us started a new fan site but it didn’t last very long.  I think the official reason in most of our minds was that we all got too busy. Most of us were in school or had real jobs and that started to take priority but really, as much as we tried, we could never recreate what we used to have.

Now that I think about it, this might be why I’m not much of a joiner online but really just a lurker.  It’s not how I want to spend majority of my time online, these days but also it can get rather negative pretty quickly.  I follow many authors on twitter and tumblr and there I get the gist of what is going on in the fandoms they created.  I can see the other creative things my fellow readers are making and read thoughts and theories without have to truly have to participate.  I’m not sure what that says about me but I do think it has lessens some of my online stress . Fandoms are great at uniting  people from all over the world with like interests but it can also be toxic.  I don’t regret the time I spent on Roddickrocks because it introduced me to some of the best people in the world that I still am friends with but I definitely do miss the negativity that surrounded the ending.

So why am I bringing this up?  An author I follow, Cassandra Clare, decided to take a break from social media after the fandom she inspired sort of turned on her.  Her books, The Mortal Instruments have been turned into a movie and now is being turned into a show.  There was apparently a rift between fans who loved the old cast and fans who love the new cast.  Clare decided not to take sides and was threatened by fans for it.  Recently, she with another favorite author of mine, Maggie Stiefvater did an interview about the good and bad of fandoms and it’s a great read.  They talk about how fandoms have changed.  How twitter and tumblr help and hamper them.  How they both want to accessible to fans but being too assessable comes with a price.  How they are now treated by fans.  They also talk about how that women in general are treated.  It’s a well thought out discussion that I think is very valuable to read.

So please read it here and leave comment below about what you think?  What are experiences in being apart of a fandom?  Are like me and just lurk on the outside or do you actively participate?  Sound off below.

Library Books

As you know from reading my tags (which I’m sure you all do), I get a lot of my books from the public library. This is strategic on my part. As a graduate student who is a year away from having her PhD, I’m hoping (and working my butt off so) that in a year I will be packing all of my belongings and moving someplace else for a job. So, the fewer books I buy (and I love buying books) the fewer books I have to pack and move.

Plus, I have a lot of fun on the library’s website. I like to make lists of books I am interested in and then work my way through the lists. Recently, many of the books I’ve wanted have had waiting lists, so it is fun to put yourself on the list and then anticipate the book. You get an email telling you that it is your turn. It is a little like Christmas! So, this is the trade off. I don’t get to buy endless stacks of books but I do get to create lists and then pick up books at the library. As far as trades go, it is not bad.

There is one problem with this, though. When everything you’re waiting for becomes available at the same time. I currently have five things checked out from the library that our due in the next 5-12 days. They were all on waiting lists so I had to check them out or lose my spot on the list. I’ve only managed to start three of them and so far only managed to finish one of them. I guess I just need to read faster!

Also, I feel a little guilty that I have books checked out that I haven’t gotten to start yet that other people are waiting for.

Of course, if I don’t make it to the end of all of the books before I have to return them, I can always put myself back on the waiting list. This is something I had to do with Gilead. It doesn’t bother me to break up the reading of a book. I’m pretty well trained in reading more than one thing at a time and spreading the readings out.

Do you check books out from your public library? How do you feel about waiting lists? Are they a source of anticipation-creation or frustration? What is your favorite part of your public library? Join us in the comments!

RE: Sexism, Twitter and Giant Insects

One last thing on the whole Andrew Smith fiasco.  Maggie Stiefvater said it best on twitter.

https://twitter.com/mstiefvater/status/576773638512340992

https://twitter.com/mstiefvater/status/576773905878269952

https://twitter.com/mstiefvater/status/576774062812372992

https://twitter.com/mstiefvater/status/576774253162397696

https://twitter.com/mstiefvater/status/576774333261078528

https://twitter.com/mstiefvater/status/576774565411610624

The author who said that Maggie was “more familiar with manly car things” was a female author.  It’s also a pretty benign comment that probably wasn’t meant to be sexist but could be taken as that, just as Smith’s comments were.  It goes both ways.  That’s why we have to talk about.  Sexism has become such a part of culture that we don’t even truly realize we do it.

Sexism, Twitter and Giant Insects

Author Andrew Smith is having a good year. His last book, Grasshopper Jungle, won a Printz Honor and he’s been getting good reviews on his new book, The Alex Crow.  He’s been called the Kurt Vonnegurt of YA and Grasshopper Jungle has shades of Slaughterhouse-Five with it’s multi-layered plot lines  that are kinda absurd.  However, he started a controversy after comments he recently made to Vice.com  Here’s the quote that got him in trouble.

On the flip side, it sometimes seems like there isn’t much of a way into your books for female readers. Where are all the women in your work?
I was raised in a family with four boys, and I absolutely did not know anything about girls at all. I have a daughter now; she’s 17. When she was born, that was the first girl I ever had in my life. I consider myself completely ignorant to all things woman and female. I’m trying to be better though.

So, he’s saying that the reason that his female characters are one dimensional is because he has had no experience with them so he can’t write them.  By that logic, what experience does he have with giant insects that he was able to make them believable? Anyway, it’s not surprisingly, many women in literary circles took to twitter and other social media and called him out on this comment and in response it seems Mr. Smith deleted his twitter page.  In return, many of the women who criticized have been harassed and bullied for speaking up.  Criticizing someone’s work is not bullying them and nor is having a valid point either. This has sadly become all to common on social media.  Let’s not forget that Gamer Gate is still going on. That many women on the internet are threatened with violence for nothing but pointing out sexist practices and trying to start conversations to change them.

I like this tweet by author Shannon Hale.*

but I feel for women author they really don’t have the luxury of creating one dimensional characters the way men authors do at least when it comes to female characters.  I feel like it a female author wrote male characters the way that most female characters are that they would be undoubtedly called on and probably wouldn’t publish another book. But that’s just me.

I liked Grasshopper Jungle. My only beef with it was the fact that the only real female character in it, Shann was a non-entity.   As I wrote in mini-review of the book earlier this year.

Weird. In one way, it was refreshing to have a novel take on bisexuality in such a head on way but on the other hand, the female lead Shann, is pretty one dimensional. So it’s progressive in one way and a step back in another way.

So one one hand, he wrote a compelling story of a boy struggling with his own sexuality against the backdrop of apocalyptic destruction by giant grasshoppers.  On the other hand, the few women in the story were the girlfriend, who is a none issue besides being the main character girlfriend and mom of the main character’s best friend who is promiscuous. So, in Mr Smith’s own words, he is ignorant of all things women so he’s just not going to put the time into writing them.

So this has turned out to be a longer post then I intended but that’s OK.  We need to talk about this.  We need to talk about the lack of diversity in literature, whether it’s adult fiction or young adult fiction.  We need to stop allowing authors get away with lazy opinions that because they are not female or minority that they can’t possibly write those characters so they don’t and when they do, we should call them out on it and not fear being, harassed, threatened or bullied.  Andrew Smith is good author as he was just recently honored with a prestigious award so he should be held to higher standard but then again all authors should be too.

So I ask you, what is your opinion on this or this topic?  Sound off in the comments below.

*Speaking of Shannon Hale.  Here’s an account from a school visit she recently did where only girls were given permission to hear her talk, not the boys.

From Another Perspective: Five Novels and One Play about Supporting Characters in Our Favorite Stories

Earlier this week Beth asked what if our favorite stories were told to us from another perspective. Whose perspective and what stories would we like to hear again? Turning a tale on its ear is a pretty popular literary theme, so with the help of some discussion (both on and offline!), I’ve come up with this list of stories from a supporting character’s perspective.

Gertrude and Claudius

This was suggested by a friend and now that I know it exists I can’t wait to read it. Updike has said, “[he]sought to narrate the romance that preceded the tragedy.” This a prequel that tells us what was happening in Denmark prior to the arrival of the ghost-seeing Prince. Context is everything.

Wicked

Ah, the novel that everyone has been singing for a decade. This is the tale of The Wizard of Oz told from the perspective of the witch. In all honesty, I’ve not read this one. Or, seen the musical. But, I do know this: When we tell stories about “good” and “evil” we are make assumptions about what “good” and “evil” actually are. We know that Dorothy sees the Wicked Witch of the West as evil, but how can we know that Dorothy is telling us the whole story?

Lamb

This is the first novel on this list that takes a new perspective on the bible. We know a lot about the infancy of Jesus (stables, running from Client Kings, Wise men, etc) and we know a lot about the lead up to the crucifixion (fishing for men, flipping tables and beating money lenders, getting arrested, etc) but what do we know about the intervening years? The ones that aren’t really discussed in the new testament? Well, this novel attempts to fill that in providing tales from those missing years from the perspective of Jesus’s childhood friend Biff. Basically everything you need to know about this book is in this phrase: Jesus’s childhood friend Biff.

I’m not a fan of Jane Eyre, I’ll just admit to that now. I think Jane is kinda boring and Rochester is a horrible and stuffy human being. (Sometimes, it’s tough to say which of those is his biggest flaws.) But, my dislike of Rochester boils down to one key fact: Dude keeps a woman in his attic. Wide Sargasso Sea tells the story of Antoinette Cosway, the woman who will eventually become that woman in Rochester’s attic. Set in the Caribbean and drawing on the childhood memory of the author this tale attempts to give the Crazy lady in the attic a little more dimension.

The Red Tent

This is the tale of Dinah and it takes a look at ancient womanhood by exploring the lives of women referenced in the book of Genesis. Everybody knows the stories of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. But, what do we know about their wives and daughters (aside from who they married and who they birthed)? This is an interesting take on a religious text.

I hesitated to include this because I’ve already included Gertrude and Claudius but it is too enjoyable to give it a pass. This is the entire tale told in Hamlet from the perspective of two minor (and utterly bewildered) characters. Of course, we know from having seen Hamlet that this will all end in tragedy, but there’s a lot of comedy on the way to those two open graves.

Midnight Sun by Stephenie Meyer

Twilight came up in the comments so I felt that this needed to be mentioned. Stephenie Meyer posted a partial draft of the first part of Twilight from Edward’s perspective. I have such mixed feelings about these books that it is hard to comment on them. But, this one is up online for free, so that might be a point in its favor.

Do you have a favorite book that re-tells a tale from the perspective of another character? We’d love to hear about it in the comments!

What if?

Featured imageBuzzfeed reimaged Harry Potter as if Hermoine Granger was the main character.  And it was awesome! It got me thinking.  If you could change the main character of any story, who would it be and why?  I mean, what if it was Peeta, the Golden Boy instead of Katniss, the Girl on Fire? Or if Dr. Watson was the detective who solved the crimes and not Sherlock Holmes?  What if Twilight’s main couple was Alice and Jasper, instead of Bella and Edward and Jacob?  What if it was Annabeth Chase and the Olympians instead of Percy?

So tell us, which supporting characters, would you promote to the main character and why? How would it change the story? Let’s hear it.

How Fast Do You Read or How Often?

I’ve been reading A Dance of Dragons, as you know. It’s huge. Over 1,000 pages.  It’s literally a brick.  Ok, not literally but you get the idea.  Every time I bring it out to read at work someone mentions how big it is.  The other day this happened again. I mentioned that I had a little over 200 pages left to read that I should finish it this week.  My coworker was shocked.  He asked when I started reading. I had started about two weeks ago.  This started a whole conversation on how fast I read.  Apparently, reading 700+ pages in two weeks is a lot.  Normally, in two weeks, I would have read at least two books but also I don’t usually read books as dense as the Game of Thrones series.  I tried to make the argument, it’s not that I read fast, it’s that I read often.

I read on my commute to and from work.  That is about an hour and half round trip. I also read on my work breaks.  I have two jobs so I have two of them.  So that’s another hour and half.  So I read about three hours a day 5 days a week.  I usually read for a couple of hours on my days off, maybe an hour or two.  It depends on how many errands I have to run or what else I have to do.  So we are now up to about 15 to 19 hours a week, give or take.  I actually used to read a lot more because I used to read before I went to bed.  I don’t do that as much anymore because of my work schedule.

So is that a lot of time to read?  Just about right?  Not anywhere near as much as you?  But I do think it backs my theory that I read more often then read fast.  I may read faster then some but I don’t read as fast as others.  I just prioritize reading over other things. .

So how often do you read? And when do you read? How fast do you read or how slowly?  Sound off in the comments and let us know.