
I’m already into this book from the description of half travelogue and half journal.

I’m already into this book from the description of half travelogue and half journal.
I’m not sure where to begin because there is so much here and hard to explain. The assignment is examine how Ursula K. Le Guin uses language to tell her story. The language is very lush and full of descriptions of the strange world of Winter. A harsh world that is like living on the Artic in our world. The people of this world are gender neutral and assexual for most of the life except for when they are in “kemmer” where partner with another person in “kemmer” and could be female or male depending on things went. They could be the a father to one child and mother to another. Le Guin uses the “he” pronoun for all the Getheren even though they are not male or female. I believe it was used more simplistic reasons then insinuated that they are more male most of the time then female. It was hard as the reader to understand that, that when “he” was being used it wasn’t that the character was a male but a Genthen.
Genly Ai is an evnoy for the Ekumen. He has come to Winter to try to get an alliance with them but things don’t go as planned. Through out the novel he is mislead , betrayed and betrays himself. He is lead throughout the novel by the Estrevan, first as Prime Minister and then as friend. Ai has trouble first trusting him as he doesn’t understand where he is coming from. Is he a friend or foe? Ai also had to get over the human thinking of people as only one gender, which he struggles with as much as the reader does, I think. Over time they become friends and maybe more as they work together to get the alliance done. This was a beautifully written novel that I’m glad I read it because I don’t think ever read anything like it.
You know when you meet someone who loves what they do so much that when they talk about it they get so excited about it even though you have absolutely no idea what they are talking about but you are so taken in by their enthusiasm that it doesn’t matter. This is often how I feel when Kate talks about Linguistics. She gets so excited and her face lights up and it’s just so Kate that I want to know what she’s talking about and be just as excited as she is. John McWhorter is the same way. I can feel his excitement on the page as he talked about one language after another. I’ll admit that there were a few things I still don’t understand but I think I get the gist. It’s interesting on how languages evolve and change over centuries. Obviously I knew that the English we speak today is not the English that was spoken in Shakespeare’s day or even Chaucer’s but never really thought about it how we got to where we are now. Basically, adults needed to be able to communicate but were unable to grasp some on the complexities of the language so they simplified it and taught it to their kids and so forth and so on. It’s kind of amazing. I basically learned that the more people who speak a language over centuries, the less complicated it is. If you speak a language that only a few know and have all learned from childhood it’s going to be more complicated it because adults from the outside have little use to learning it to communicate it. I’m probably oversimplifying it but that’s fascinating. He makes arguments for what languages are categorized and how our own biases make us judge languages and what are real languages and what are not. Does it have to be written? Spoken by a certain number of people? Have it’s own grammar? Follow certain rules? All very interesting questions that I really can’t do justice answering but say read the book and get suck into his excitement and enthusiasm while you are at it.

Book two in my exploration of language.

Well Kate is almost finished with her homework assignment so I guess I better get going on mine. Pretty excited to dive into my sister’s world.